Missouri Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to Congressional Redistricting Law, Upholds GOP-Favored Map for 2024 Elections
Key keywords: Missouri Supreme Court, congressional redistricting law, Missouri congressional district map, redistricting legal challenge, 2024 U.S. House of Representatives elections, voting rights advocacy groups, Missouri Republican-led legislature, partisan gerrymandering, fair representation, voting right protection
On Tuesday, the Missouri Supreme Court issued a 5-2 ruling rejecting a long-running legal challenge to the state’s 2022 congressional redistricting law, upholding the Republican-drawn district map that will govern U.S. House races in the state through at least 2032. The lawsuit, filed by a coalition of voting rights organizations, Democratic Party activists, and minority voters across Missouri, argued that the redistricting plan violated multiple provisions of the Missouri state constitution, including clauses requiring fair representation and equal voting power for all residents.
Plaintiffs presented extensive evidence showing that the map was intentionally gerrymandered to give Republican candidates an unfair advantage in 6 of Missouri’s 8 congressional districts, splitting densely populated, left-leaning urban communities in St. Louis and Kansas City across multiple districts to dilute the voting power of Democratic and minority voters. They noted that the map was designed to lock in a 6-2 Republican majority in the state’s U.S. House delegation, even though Democratic candidates regularly win roughly 40% of the statewide vote in major elections.
In the majority opinion, the court’s conservative majority ruled that plaintiffs failed to meet the legal threshold to overturn the redistricting law, noting that the Missouri state constitution does not explicitly bar partisan gerrymandering, and that the state legislature has broad authority to draw district boundaries as part of its statutory duties. The two liberal justices on the court issued a scathing dissenting opinion, arguing that the ruling effectively gives state lawmakers unlimited leeway to engage in extreme partisan manipulation of electoral maps, at the expense of fair representation for Missouri voters who do not support the ruling party.
The ruling removes the last legal barrier to using the contested map for the 2024 U.S. House elections, which are scheduled for November. Advocacy groups that backed the lawsuit have stated that while they are disappointed with the ruling, they will continue to push for state constitutional reforms to ban partisan gerrymandering in future redistricting cycles. Republican leaders in the Missouri General Assembly praised the ruling as a victory for the rule of law, noting that the map was drafted and passed through the standard legislative process with broad support from elected representatives of Missouri voters.
Featured Comments
As a Black voter living in Kansas City, I’m absolutely crushed by this ruling. Our community spent months testifying that this map splits our neighborhood so our votes for representatives who actually care about our needs never count. The court just said that partisan power matters more than our right to be fairly represented, and that’s a huge blow to everyone who believes in fair elections in Missouri.
This is exactly the ruling we expected and needed. The Missouri legislature followed every legal requirement when drafting this map, and it reflects the reality that Missouri is a majority conservative state. The groups that filed this lawsuit were just trying to rewrite the rules after losing elections, and it’s a relief the court didn’t enable their partisan power grab.
As an election policy analyst working in the Midwest, this ruling sets a deeply concerning precedent for states with no explicit anti-gerrymandering rules. The Missouri Supreme Court has essentially told state lawmakers that they can draw maps as skewed as they want to benefit their own party, with no judicial oversight. This will only deepen political polarization and make elected officials less accountable to the broader public.
I’m a lifelong Republican, but even I think this ruling is a mistake. Allowing extreme partisan gerrymandering hurts everyone, no matter what party you support. When districts are drawn to be safe for one party, candidates don’t have to appeal to moderate voters anymore, and we end up with more extreme politicians who don’t care about compromise. We need to fix our redistricting process before the next cycle.